<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Freezing point depression	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/</link>
	<description>Ice cream recipe and balancing software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 20:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: icecreamcalc		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icecreamcalc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 20:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1386&quot;&gt;Stephen&lt;/a&gt;.

No it&#039;s not. It&#039;s between 90 and 110. So 75 is wrong.
I will update the post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Stephen.</p>
<p>No it&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s between 90 and 110. So 75 is wrong.<br />
I will update the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephen		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey! Is the relative sweetness for honey really only 75? When I look it up on google and enter the sugar composition it comes up with a POD of around 100 or more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Is the relative sweetness for honey really only 75? When I look it up on google and enter the sugar composition it comes up with a POD of around 100 or more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: icecreamcalc		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icecreamcalc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1319&quot;&gt;Nitin&lt;/a&gt;.

Many recipe developers and tools, including the University of Guelph, use 100 as the PAC for 100g sucrose in 1000g mix.
This is the most common way of defining PAC, some also use 1.0 for this instead.
I have never seen 10? 
But, if you see 24-28 in some other source you can assume that equates to 240-280 in ICC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Nitin.</p>
<p>Many recipe developers and tools, including the University of Guelph, use 100 as the PAC for 100g sucrose in 1000g mix.<br />
This is the most common way of defining PAC, some also use 1.0 for this instead.<br />
I have never seen 10?<br />
But, if you see 24-28 in some other source you can assume that equates to 240-280 in ICC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nitin		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 01:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a little confused at why IceCreamCalc shows PAC values for common recipes as 200-300 and elsewhere I&#039;m seeing recommended PAC for Ice Cream is 24-28?  

You say 100g of Sucrose in 1000g water is PAC 100.
The other blog Holger linked above says 1g of Sucrose in 100g of water is PAC 1.  Which I think suggests 10g of sucrose in 1000g is PAC 1, and thus 100g of Sucrose in 1000g would be PAC 10. 

Why are these different by a factor of 10?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little confused at why IceCreamCalc shows PAC values for common recipes as 200-300 and elsewhere I&#8217;m seeing recommended PAC for Ice Cream is 24-28?  </p>
<p>You say 100g of Sucrose in 1000g water is PAC 100.<br />
The other blog Holger linked above says 1g of Sucrose in 100g of water is PAC 1.  Which I think suggests 10g of sucrose in 1000g is PAC 1, and thus 100g of Sucrose in 1000g would be PAC 10. </p>
<p>Why are these different by a factor of 10?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: icecreamcalc		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icecreamcalc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 05:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1268&quot;&gt;Marcus&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, salt is used. But salt is calculated separately so you should not add it to the PAC of the ingredient. If you do it will be counted twice.
There is a Data item called &quot;PACtot&quot; that includes Salt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Marcus.</p>
<p>Yes, salt is used. But salt is calculated separately so you should not add it to the PAC of the ingredient. If you do it will be counted twice.<br />
There is a Data item called &#8220;PACtot&#8221; that includes Salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marcus		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 19:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello;
I was thinking .. If I add salt in a recipe in your software (Amazing program It Is !) or use an ingredient containing salt (Example parmesan cheese), is your software take in account the PAC of the salt to calculate the freezing curve ?

Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello;<br />
I was thinking .. If I add salt in a recipe in your software (Amazing program It Is !) or use an ingredient containing salt (Example parmesan cheese), is your software take in account the PAC of the salt to calculate the freezing curve ?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: icecreamcalc		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icecreamcalc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 07:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1146&quot;&gt;Gaudenzio&lt;/a&gt;.

What you can do is to calculate the molar mass with an experiment. Then the PAC can be calculated by dividing the molar mass of sucrose with the molar mass of your unknown solvent.
To determine the molar mass of an unknown powdered solute using freezing point depression. 
Dissolve a known mass of the powdered solute in a known mass of water and measure the freezing point of the solution. 
The difference in freezing points, along with the masses of the solute and solvent, is used to calculate the molar mass of the solute.
I will email the procedure and formulas and some more explanations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Gaudenzio.</p>
<p>What you can do is to calculate the molar mass with an experiment. Then the PAC can be calculated by dividing the molar mass of sucrose with the molar mass of your unknown solvent.<br />
To determine the molar mass of an unknown powdered solute using freezing point depression.<br />
Dissolve a known mass of the powdered solute in a known mass of water and measure the freezing point of the solution.<br />
The difference in freezing points, along with the masses of the solute and solvent, is used to calculate the molar mass of the solute.<br />
I will email the procedure and formulas and some more explanations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gaudenzio		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-3/#comment-1146</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaudenzio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 14:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1146</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Patrik,
thank you for your answer. I have an alternative idea to share, maybe you can give an opinion about it.
Could I determine the PAC value experimentally? I would try iteratively to prepare 2 water solutions with the same freezing point, one with pure sucrose, and another one with the powder of which I want to determine the PAC value. If I need twice the quantity of this powder to get the same freezing point, would that mean that the PAC value is 50, or is it something more complex than that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrik,<br />
thank you for your answer. I have an alternative idea to share, maybe you can give an opinion about it.<br />
Could I determine the PAC value experimentally? I would try iteratively to prepare 2 water solutions with the same freezing point, one with pure sucrose, and another one with the powder of which I want to determine the PAC value. If I need twice the quantity of this powder to get the same freezing point, would that mean that the PAC value is 50, or is it something more complex than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: icecreamcalc		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-2/#comment-1145</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icecreamcalc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 11:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-2/#comment-1144&quot;&gt;Gaudenzio&lt;/a&gt;.

You can&#039;t use the nutrition label for glucose powders. The label only have to show the mono- and disaccharides so you don&#039;t know what other sugars the product contains.
I suggest you use the PAC and POD from the Glucose Powder 20DE in the standard database PAC=37 POD=16
Or if you find reliable values from some other source.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Gaudenzio.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t use the nutrition label for glucose powders. The label only have to show the mono- and disaccharides so you don&#8217;t know what other sugars the product contains.<br />
I suggest you use the PAC and POD from the Glucose Powder 20DE in the standard database PAC=37 POD=16<br />
Or if you find reliable values from some other source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gaudenzio		</title>
		<link>https://icecreamcalc.com/2020/07/24/freezing-point-depression/comment-page-2/#comment-1144</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaudenzio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 10:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://icecreamcalc.com/?p=373#comment-1144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Patrick, thank you very much for your invaluable work.
I&#039;m trying to use a product which is adverteised as Powder Glucose DE21, and for that purpose i&#039;m trying to estimate the PAC and POD values (which are not provided in the technical sheet).
Actually the nutritional values are kinda weird because sugars are quite low, it looks like more something in the middle between Powder Glucose and Maltodextrines.
These are the only known data, is there any way to give a reasonable estimation of the PAC and POD values?
(for 100gr)
Total Moisture: 3,5gr
Total Carbohydrates: 96,5gr.
Sugars: 8gr (Glucose 1,5gr, Maltose 6,5gr)
Other carbohydrates (oligo and polisacch.) 88,5gr.
Dextrose equivalent: 21

Thanks in advance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick, thank you very much for your invaluable work.<br />
I&#8217;m trying to use a product which is adverteised as Powder Glucose DE21, and for that purpose i&#8217;m trying to estimate the PAC and POD values (which are not provided in the technical sheet).<br />
Actually the nutritional values are kinda weird because sugars are quite low, it looks like more something in the middle between Powder Glucose and Maltodextrines.<br />
These are the only known data, is there any way to give a reasonable estimation of the PAC and POD values?<br />
(for 100gr)<br />
Total Moisture: 3,5gr<br />
Total Carbohydrates: 96,5gr.<br />
Sugars: 8gr (Glucose 1,5gr, Maltose 6,5gr)<br />
Other carbohydrates (oligo and polisacch.) 88,5gr.<br />
Dextrose equivalent: 21</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: icecreamcalc.com @ 2026-03-02 00:00:56 by W3 Total Cache
-->